Q. 71. What forms the basis of the passage?
(A) The changing nature of city life
(B) A legal dispute between a citizen and State
(C) A poor state of affairs of a common man
(D) Benevolence of the Court
Answer:
Explanation:
Q. 72. What was Mr. Sharma’s contention regarding the by-law?
(A) It is targeting the poor people of society, like him.
(B) Residents are enjoying too much freedom at the expense of other people.
(C) It unfairly targeted his business and violated his right to conduct business freely.
(D) The Municipality is too harsh on him and unnecessarily interfering with his business.
Answer:
Explanation:
Q. 73. What was the City Municipality’s rationale behind passing the law?
(A) To teach people like Mr. Sharma a lesson.
(B) To maintain the residential character of the neighbourhood and preserve the quality of life for its residents.
(C) To maintain the bustling character of the city and let the residents enjoy its beauty.
(D) To underscore the importance of legislative power given to the local authorities.
Answer:
Explanation:
Q. 74. How did the court ultimately rule in the case?
(A) Mr. Sharma’s right to conduct business is paramount.
(B) The Municipality is victimizing common people.
(C) The by-law is unconstitutional.
(D) The residents have no right to have unlimited freedom.
Answer:
Explanation:
Q. 75. What did the judge emphasize in the judgment?
(A) Business owners should be given appropriate opportunity to flourish.
(B) Importance of balancing the interests of the business owners and residents.
(C) Nice environment of the city should be maintained.
(D) Everyone in the city should have a beautiful life.
Answer:
Explanation: